Re: New house, new shack, new antenna?
Posted: 30 Aug 2018, 19:35
^^ You forgot to mention the A-99 is in a lead safe ^^
Gus, vertical antennas are much more susceptible to electrical interference, that's why the loop was suggested.GusWroclaw wrote: ↑10 Oct 2018, 15:24I wonder, what's the reason for avoiding a vertical? Is there something specific to OP's situation or do you avoid vericals in general?
Thanks Gary, good to know. And is it the case that even a vertically polarized loop is better than a vertical in this case? Or is it vertical polarization in general what needs to be avoided in this case? I wouldn't mind reading more info on why verticals are so bad if you have a an explanation or a link to an explanation.GaryWilson wrote: ↑21 Oct 2018, 12:19 Gus, vertical antennas are much more susceptible to electrical interference, that's why the loop was suggested.
73's Gary.
Gus, sorry for the delay replying. Most electrical interference will be polarised horizontally so any antenna which has a vertical element to it will be prone to picking up those signals. It is widely accepted that horizontal antennas are less noisy because of this. There are considerations though if you are working local stations that are vertically polarised you will see a big reduction in the wanted signal if you are horizontally polarised, if you are working DX/skip stations then this is much less relevant and horizontal becomes beneficial because of the reduced noise received.GusWroclaw wrote: ↑21 Oct 2018, 12:43Thanks Gary, good to know. And is it the case that even a vertically polarized loop is better than a vertical in this case? Or is it vertical polarization in general what needs to be avoided in this case? I wouldn't mind reading more info on why verticals are so bad if you have a an explanation or a link to an explanation.GaryWilson wrote: ↑21 Oct 2018, 12:19 Gus, vertical antennas are much more susceptible to electrical interference, that's why the loop was suggested.
73's Gary.