VHF CB proposal

Licence free two-way radio services that now includes both FM and digital channels. Discuss models, modifications and other similar worldwide standards such as FRS and GMRS.
Post Reply

Should we have a VHF CB allocation?

Yes
77
81%
No
18
19%
 
Total votes: 95

User avatar
Excalibur
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 1160
Joined: 27 Mar 2011, 14:06
Location: England

VHF CB proposal

Post by Excalibur »

I propose that we have a VHF CB system with 8 channels. Like the USA MURS system on 151 MHZ. It would allow 5 watts output power and you can use any radio you want on it that is CE approved. It would be of great use to those who wish to have a licence free radio system in the VHF region where it can be used in forests and often has a greater range than UHF depending on the conditions.

We have a HF CB and a UHF CB (pmr446) system. We should also have a VHF CB system.

Could we possibly make a petition to ofcom? Maybe get a few radio experts to say it would benefit the community and be of help to radio enthusiasts. I know Ofcom tend to care more about selling parts of the radio spectrum to users but if they really are a decent organisation they would support this project

Please tell me what you think in the poll and comment if you want!
User avatar
Minus1
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 1222
Joined: 12 Jun 2011, 11:15
Location: West Midlands

Re: VHF CB proposal

Post by Minus1 »

OFCOM's consultation about the 143-156 band (July 2012) seems to have stalled completely.
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consul ... input/?a=0
Anything that gives them a kick up the backside has to be a good idea.
Not sure about a crummy 8 channels though, Australian UHF CB has 77!
KEY : = channel/stud | ~ = CTCSS/DCS | ^ = transmitter site | ¯ = overhead | * = trunked
wires
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 254
Joined: 15 Mar 2007, 15:48
Location: plymouth, sunny south west

Re: VHF CB proposal

Post by wires »

Would be nice, we use ukgen's for a local net at the moment
pmr446man
Radio Addict
Radio Addict
Posts: 690
Joined: 04 Aug 2009, 15:08
Contact:

Re: VHF CB proposal

Post by pmr446man »

Good idea nice 5w power limit would be nice, But why have 3 people already voted no?
pmr446 king.
pmr446man
Radio Addict
Radio Addict
Posts: 690
Joined: 04 Aug 2009, 15:08
Contact:

Re: VHF CB proposal

Post by pmr446man »

wires wrote:Would be nice, we use ukgen's for a local net at the moment
Near Drake circus uk gen gets a fair bit (UHF) most towns do.
pmr446 king.
wires
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 254
Joined: 15 Mar 2007, 15:48
Location: plymouth, sunny south west

Re: VHF CB proposal

Post by wires »

7 chan for vhf, so not really an issue
User avatar
Farty
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 3694
Joined: 20 Oct 2008, 14:40
Location: IO92ND

Re: VHF CB proposal

Post by Farty »

pmr446man wrote:Good idea nice 5w power limit would be nice, But why have 3 people already voted no?
Because we already have an 80 channel hf cb system that's all but unused.
In Before The Lock Champion of Total Magnificenceness May 2016
User avatar
Excalibur
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 1160
Joined: 27 Mar 2011, 14:06
Location: England

Re: VHF CB proposal

Post by Excalibur »

Fartblood wrote:
pmr446man wrote:Good idea nice 5w power limit would be nice, But why have 3 people already voted no?
Because we already have an 80 channel hf cb system that's all but unused.

HF characteristics are different from VHF..With HF you have to have a large antenna that is sometimes impractical. With VHF you can have a smaller antenna meaning handheld radios can be used but it does not compromise range such as UHF.
User avatar
26CAB40
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 2537
Joined: 05 Aug 2008, 17:42
Location: £200 Jacksonville

Re: VHF CB proposal

Post by 26CAB40 »

VHF/UHF makes far more sense for a local communication system, no matter the nostalgia of 11m.
"It's worth whatever they're willing to pay"
User avatar
Farty
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 3694
Joined: 20 Oct 2008, 14:40
Location: IO92ND

Re: VHF CB proposal

Post by Farty »

You get perfectly serviceable CB handies from the likes of Midland and Intek with a respectable range of many miles, and they don't have huge antennae. They work very nicely, thank you. And it not.As.If it'll give you a.hernia, or needs an aerial so big it need planning permission...

http://www.thunderpole.co.uk/handheld-c ... dheld.html

Sensible sized, multiple channels, decent performance.

Justify it anyway you want, but the bottom line is there's a perfectly practical, work as and useable CB system already in existence and while these bands have tumbleweed blowing through them you can offer no argument that will prompt OFCUM to spend tens, maybe even hundreds of thousands.if pounds of taxpayer money even investigating such a proposal.
In Before The Lock Champion of Total Magnificenceness May 2016
User avatar
26CAB40
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 2537
Joined: 05 Aug 2008, 17:42
Location: £200 Jacksonville

Re: VHF CB proposal

Post by 26CAB40 »

Don't dare compare the range, reliability and lack of interference between 11m handies and VHF, you're onto a loser there.
11m handies are without any doubt the absolute crappest thing I have ever had the misfortune to use.
It's simple really.
An 11m helical has negative gain in all respects, they are a tiny fraction of a wavelength.
At UHF, a helical or short whip can actually exhibit gain.

Don't even go there.
"It's worth whatever they're willing to pay"
pmr446man
Radio Addict
Radio Addict
Posts: 690
Joined: 04 Aug 2009, 15:08
Contact:

Re: VHF CB proposal

Post by pmr446man »

Fartblood wrote:
pmr446man wrote:Good idea nice 5w power limit would be nice, But why have 3 people already voted no?
Because we already have an 80 channel hf cb system that's all but unused.
Perhaps you have a point but the vhf idea seems cool.
pmr446 king.
User avatar
Farty
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 3694
Joined: 20 Oct 2008, 14:40
Location: IO92ND

Re: VHF CB proposal

Post by Farty »

26CAB40 wrote:Don't dare compare the range, reliability and lack of interference between 11m handies and VHF, you're onto a loser there.
11m handies are without any doubt the absolute crappest thing I have ever had the misfortune to use.
It's simple really.
An 11m helical has negative gain in all respects, they are a tiny fraction of a wavelength.
At UHF, a helical or short whip can actually exhibit gain.

Don't even go there.
Doesn't stop them working well though. I got 8 miles out of mine yesterday to a friend travelling mobile, perfectly clear and usable. Extremely adequate for a short range licence free radio communications system. The fact that It's negative, positive, or no pain no gain is.an irrelevance - it simply functions.
In Before The Lock Champion of Total Magnificenceness May 2016
User avatar
26CAB40
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 2537
Joined: 05 Aug 2008, 17:42
Location: £200 Jacksonville

Re: VHF CB proposal

Post by 26CAB40 »

Fartblood wrote: Doesn't stop them working well though. I got 8 miles out of mine yesterday to a friend travelling mobile, perfectly clear and usable. Extremely adequate for a short range licence free radio communications system. The fact that It's negative, positive, or no pain no gain is.an irrelevance - it simply functions.
Well, the spark transmitter worked very well, people had thousands of miles out of them.
You see where this is going ?
"It's worth whatever they're willing to pay"
Post Reply