132.65

A place to discuss airband listening, frequencies and anything related to this area of the hobby.
Post Reply
User avatar
Minus1
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 1222
Joined: 12 Jun 2011, 11:15
Location: West Midlands

132.65

Post by Minus1 »

132.65 is occasionally an interesting frequemncy.

Although I have never seen any official definition of what it is assigned too, known users incliude:
RAF Northolt Ops
Royal Flights
Search & Rescue
Coastguard

This morning I heard a British Airways aircraft talking to Portland Coastguard about a ship that was entering a harbour trialling what appeared to be an oil slick behind it. How they came to be talking on that freq I don't know.

One to put in your scanner if you don't have it already.

132_65 for the benefit of the useless phpBB search engine that can't search for frequencies…
KEY : = channel/stud | ~ = CTCSS/DCS | ^ = transmitter site | ¯ = overhead | * = trunked
Top
grafter
Radio Addict
Radio Addict
Posts: 805
Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 06:31

Re: 132.65

Post by grafter »

Pilots must know this allocation because I've also heard a BA flight telling Dover Coastguard they'd just overflown a ship in the SW lane that appeared to be flushing its tanks. Dover used to use this one daily to talk to EN when they were 'ghost' hunting ships that hadn't called in or where in contravention of the TSS. Used to hear the Kent air ambulance on it as well taking taskings but presume they've now gone Tetra.
my friend grafter, seems like you are using a very offensive tone in the reply.
Top
User avatar
WoollyMammoth
Radio Addict
Radio Addict
Posts: 743
Joined: 26 Jul 2013, 10:43

Re: 132.65

Post by WoollyMammoth »

I thought coastguards used 156.000 aka CH 0 in the marine band.
Top
User avatar
MrWeetabix
Admin
Admin
Posts: 16395
Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 13:34
Call Sign: 26TM175
Location: Gateshead

Re: 132.65

Post by MrWeetabix »

WoollyMammoth wrote:I thought coastguards used 156.000 aka CH 0 in the marine band.
Yes but aircraft won;t have this...... must be some kind of inter-op frequency allocation
26TM175. OP: Craig. QTH: Gateshead IO94EW. Also 163TM175 when mobile in Wales 8)

Transmission1 on Facebook http://tinyurl.com/TM1onFB | Tango Mike on Facebook http://tinyurl.com/TangoMikeFB |
Top
User avatar
WoollyMammoth
Radio Addict
Radio Addict
Posts: 743
Joined: 26 Jul 2013, 10:43

Re: 132.65

Post by WoollyMammoth »

MrWeetabix wrote:
WoollyMammoth wrote:I thought coastguards used 156.000 aka CH 0 in the marine band.
Yes but aircraft won;t have this...... must be some kind of inter-op frequency allocation
OK thanks, I will add this to my list of frequencies and see if I can pick anything up. :P
Top
User avatar
RogerD
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 1819
Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 13:22

Re: 132.65

Post by RogerD »

Both of the examples above tie-in with the "counter pollution on-scene" use detailed here in this Search And Rescue doc
http://www.dft.gov.uk/mca/uksar.pdf
Top
User avatar
grahamwilman01
Radio Addict
Radio Addict
Posts: 775
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 23:01
Call Sign: 2E0CSU
Location: 2miles NNW of the end of RNWY 05 EGCC

Re: 132.65

Post by grahamwilman01 »

RogerD wrote:Both of the examples above tie-in with the "counter pollution on-scene" use detailed here in this Search And Rescue doc
http://www.dft.gov.uk/mca/uksar.pdf
the internet search I have done agrees with RogerD there is a little more information from this link. http://tinyurl.com/mx8dywc
Top
falkirk1976
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 184
Joined: 27 Jul 2012, 10:23
Location: falkirk

Re: 132.65

Post by falkirk1976 »

added.ty
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Airband Discussion”